Study Shabbat folio 92A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
for if he wishes, he can tear the seam and take the money. The Talmud answers: Here, it is referring to long metal strips. As long as the entire purse is not in the public domain, he did not acquire any of the long strips, and he is not liable for theft. The Talmud asks: And since the purse has lac
There is a dispute between Abaye and Rava that parallels the dispute between Ḥizkiya and R' Yoḥanan. And, so too, Rava said: They only taught in the Mishnah that one is exempt with regard to carrying out a basket full of cucumbers and gourds. However, for carrying out a basket full of mustard seeds
As it was stated that they disputed the matter of one who carries out fruit into the public domain. Abaye said: If he carried them out in his hand, he is liable even if the rest of his body remained in the private domain because fusion of several objects in his hand is not considered fusion. Howeve
These are contrary to their opinions stated above. The Talmud answers: Reverse the opinions, and say that Rava was the one who said: If he carried it out in his hand, he is liable. The Talmud raises an objection. Didn’t we learn in the Mishnah: In a case where the homeowner extended his hand into t
Mishnah: One who carries out an object into the public domain on Shabbat, whether he carried it out in his right hand or in his left hand, whether he carried it in his lap or on his shoulders, he is liable. All of these are typical methods of carrying out an object, as this was the method of carry