Study Shabbat folio 12A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
that the wall will not be damaged, it is not under the rubric of the verse: “If water be placed.” The water does not have the legal status of water poured for that purpose. This tanna does not consider protecting the wall from dirt as a significant usage. Similarly, protecting the zav from being so
Rather, this halakha with regard to the zav is comparable only to the latter clause of the Mishnah dealing with rainwater, in which we learned: A bowl that the drip of rain from the roof dropped into it, the water that splashes or overflows from the bowl does not have the legal status of water coll
Rather, it is Abaye and Rava, who both said that this is not difficult. There is no contradiction between the baraitot. This baraita, which deems a zav liable by Torah law for going out with his pouch, is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda. His opinion is that one who performs a prohibit
The Sage of the school of R' Yishmael taught in a baraita: A person may go out ab initio donning tefillin on Friday at nightfall. Although one does not don tefillin on Shabbat and going out donning them involves an element of carrying, there is no concern lest he forget and remove them on Shabbat.
We learned in the Mishnah: One may not shake his clothes on Shabbat to rid them of lice; and one may not read a book by candlelight, so that he will not come to adjust the wick of the lamp. A dilemma was raised before the rabbis: Does this mean that one may not shake his clothes even during the day