Study Yevamot folio 57A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
this one may also partake of teruma until that time. The Talmud refutes this argument: From where do we know that this is correct? Perhaps R' Elazar and R' Shimon stated their opinion there only with regard to a priest whose status can entitle her to partake of teruma in another case, but here, in
And if you say that here too, his status can at least entitle his wife to partake of teruma if he marries the daughter of converts, wasn’t it already raised as a dilemma by R' Yoḥanan before R' Oshaya whether the daughter of converts who married a priest with crushed testicles may partake of teruma,
It was stated that Abaye said: Women betrothed to a priest with crushed testicles may eat teruma since his status entitles his wife to partake of teruma in a case where he has not known her. If a priest was properly married and then his testicles became crushed, as long as he has not known his wif
Rava said she may continue to partake of teruma for a different reason: She may eat teruma since the status of this priest entitles his Canaanite slaves and female slaves to partake of teruma. Because he has the power to enable others to partake of teruma, the case of a woman betrothed to a priest w
The Talmud clarifies the two opinions. Abaye did not say in accordance with the opinion of Rava because he claims that we derive the halakhot related to the acquisition of marriage from the acquisition of marriage, and we do not derive the halakhot related to the acquisition of marriage from the acq