Study Temurah folio 7A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Since it might enter your mind to say that granted, if one does this initially, before the lottery, we do not know if this blemished animal will be designated as the one sacrificed to YHWH or sent to the wilderness. Therefore, the one who consecrated the blemished animal is flogged. But here, sinc
§ The Master said above: The rabbis said in the name of R' Yosei, son of R' Yehuda: One who sacrifices a blemished animal violates a prohibition against the collection of the blood as well. The Talmud asks: What is the reasoning of R' Yosei, son of R' Yehuda? The Talmud answers: The verse states:
The Talmud asks: And according to the first tanna, who holds that one is not liable for collection of the blood per se, why do I need this phrase: “You shall not offer,” stated with regard to damaged testicles? The Talmud answers: He requires it to teach that one is liable for sprinkling the blood
The Talmud challenges: But also according to R' Yosei, son of R' Yehuda, one may claim that this is the normal manner of the verse. Why does he derive a halakha from this phrase? The Talmud answers: Yes, it is indeed so. He does not derive liability for sprinkling of the blood from the phrase “upo
The Talmud asks: And according to the first tanna, who holds that one is not liable for collection of the blood, why do I need this phrase: Neither from the hand of a foreigner shall you offer? The Talmud answers: He requires it to teach this halakha: It may enter your mind to say that since the d