Study Shevuot folio 38A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Rather, no inference is to be learned from the Mishnah.
§ The Mishnah teaches: What is the case of an oath on a deposit? It is where the claimant said to the defendant: Give me my deposit, which is in your possession, and the defendant replied: On my oath nothing of yours is in my possession, or the defendant said to him: Nothing of yours is in my poss
The baraita continues: R' Eliezer says that only if he said: Nothing of yours is in my possession, and nothing of yours, and nothing of yours, on my oath, i.e., he said the word oath at the end, is he liable for his oath concerning each and every claim. R' Shimon says: He is not liable for his oa
Shmuel and R' Yoḥanan disagree with regard to the dispute between R' Meir and R' Yehuda: Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel says: The phrasing where one uses the conjunction: And, between denials is considered by R' Meir to be a general denial and is considered by R' Yehuda to be a specific denial; and th
And R' Yoḥanan says: All concede in a case where the defendant says: And nothing of yours, that it is considered specific and that he is liable for his oath concerning each claim, even R' Meir. They disagree only with regard to a case where the defendant said: Nothing of yours, without the conjunct