Study Shabbat folio 73A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Rather, is it not that the first clause of the baraita is dealing with the contrast between Shabbat and idolatry, and the latter clause of the baraita is dealing with contrasting Shabbat and other mitzvot? And what are the circumstances of: Unwitting without intent, with regard to other mitzvot? I
A similar dispute between Abaye and Rava was stated. In the case of one who intended to throw an object two cubits in the public domain, for which he would not be liable by Torah law, and it turned out that he threw it 4 cubits, in violation of the prohibition by Torah law against carrying an objec
The Talmud comments: And it is necessary to mention these 3 disputes, despite their similarities, because each one teaches a unique element. As, had the Talmud taught us only the first, the case of one who intended to lift a plant detached from the ground and mistakenly severed a plant still attach
We learned in a Mishnah: The primary categories of labor are 40-less-one, and we discussed it and asked: Why do I need this tally of 40-less-one? And R' Yoḥanan said: The tally was included to teach that if one performed all of the prohibited labors in the course of one lapse of awareness during wh
It works out well if he holds in accordance with the opinion of R' Yoḥanan, who said: Once he was unwitting with regard to the fact that the punishment for his transgression is karet, even though he was aware that his action was in violation of a Torah prohibition and performed the transgression int