Study Shabbat folio 37A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud rejects this proof. Actually, you can say that in the first clause of the Mishnah we learned to return and the Mishnah is incomplete. A clause must be added to the Mishnah, and it teaches the following: With regard to a stove that was lit with straw or rakings, one may return a pot of c
Come and hear another resolution to this dilemma from that which R' Ḥelbo said that Rav Ḥama bar Gurya said that Rav said: They only taught that placing is permitted with regard to a stove as far as placing a pot atop it is concerned. However, placing a pot inside it is prohibited. Granted, if you
Come and hear a resolution to this dilemma from that which was taught in the Tosefta: In the case of two adjoining stoves that share a common wall, in one of them, the coals were swept or covered with ashes, and in one the coals were not swept and not covered with ashes; the ruling with regard to l
Granted, if you say that the case we learned in our Mishnah was with regard to leaving the pot on the stove, in accordance with whose opinion is our Mishnah? It is in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda. However, if you say that the case we learned in our Mishnah was with regard to returning th
This claim is rejected: Actually, you can say that the case we learned in our Mishnah was with regard to returning the pot to the stove, and our tanna in the Mishnah holds in accordance with R' Yehuda in one matter, and disagrees with him in one matter. He holds in accordance with R' Yehuda in one m