Study Shabbat folio 126B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
that have a handle may be moved on Shabbat. And Rav Yehuda bar Sheila said that Rav Asi said that R' Yoḥanan said: And that is specifically when the status of a vessel applies to them, i.e., when the cover itself is suited for use as a vessel. This is contrary to the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Ga
And if you say: Here, too, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel is referring to a case where the status of a vessel applies to the reed, does Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel require that the status of a vessel apply to it? Wasn’t it taught in a baraita: With regard to hard branches of a palm tree that one cut for f
The Talmud answers: R' Yoḥanan holds in accordance with the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel in one matter and disagrees with him in one matter.
R' Yitzḥak taught at the entrance of the house of the Exilarch: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Eliezer in the matter of a window shutter. Rav Amram raised an objection from that we learned explicitly in a Mishnah: And from their statements and their actions, we derived that one
Abaye said to Rav Amram: What is your opinion, that the proof is decisive because it was taught in the Mishnah unattributed and the halakha is in accordance with an unattributed Mishnah? The Mishnah with regard to a bolt that is dragged is also an unattributed Mishnah. The halakha should be in acco