Study Nedarim folio 16A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Talmud: Whose opinion is expressed in the Mishnah? It is apparently the opinion of R' Meir. As, if it is the opinion of R' Yehuda, there is a contradiction, because he does not differentiate whether one takes a vow by saying: An offering, and he does not differentiate whether he takes a vow by say
The Talmud continues its analysis: Say the latter clause of the Mishnah: If he says: That which I will not eat of yours is not an offering, the food is permitted. The Talmud asks: But didn’t we learn in a Mishnah (13a) that if one said: That which I will not eat of yours will be for an offering [l
The Talmud answers that this is not difficult. That Mishnah is referring to one who said: For an offering [lekorban], and the vow therefore takes effect. This Mishnah is referring to one who said: Not for an offering [la lekorban], where he is saying that it should not be an offering, and therefo
Mishnah: If one says: An oath that I will not eat of yours, or: This is an oath that I will eat of yours [she’okhal lekha], or: Not an oath that I will not eat of yours, the food is forbidden.
Talmud: By inference from the Mishnah, it may be derived that the statement: This is an oath that I will eat of yours, indicates that I will not eat. And the Talmud raises a contradiction from a Mishnah (Shevuot 19b): There are two basic types of oaths that are in fact 4: An oath that I will eat,