Study Gittin folio 83B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
isn’t the woman a divorcée with regard to engaging in licentious behavior with him? The husband stipulated that she not marry that man, but he did not prohibit her from engaging in licentious behavior with him. Therefore, she is considered a divorcée with regard to him as well. This removes the a f
The Talmud asks: If R' Akiva holds that R' Eliezer is referring to a case of an exception, he should raise an objection with regard to an exception, and if he holds that R' Eliezer is referring to a case of a stipulation, he should raise an objection with regard to a case of a stipulation. Why does
The Talmud answers: R' Akiva heard that there is someone who states R' Eliezer’s ruling with regard to an exception, and there is someone else who states it with regard to a stipulation. He therefore raised objections with regard to both exceptions and stipulations; according to the one who says th
The Talmud asks: What is the refutation that Rava found for R' Akiva’s second objection? If we say that it is that the prohibition against marrying into the priesthood is different, and therefore the halakhot of adultery and divorce cannot be inferred from it, doesn’t R' Eliezer also derive his opi
The Talmud answers: Rava taught his statement in accordance with the opinion of R' Yannai, who said in the name of one elder that R' Eliezer’s opinion is derived not from the prohibition against marrying into the priesthood, but from the verse: “And she departs out of his house, and goes and become