Study Eruvin folio 60A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
and did not establish a joint eiruv, if there is a partition 4 handbreadths wide in front of the entrance to the balcony, the balcony does not prohibit the residents of the courtyard from carrying, as each area is considered to be independent. And if not, the balcony prohibits the residents of the
The Talmud answers: With what are we dealing here? With a case where the balcony is not 10 handbreadths high from the ground. Consequently, it does not constitute a domain in its own right, and it is part of the courtyard.
The Talmud asks: If the balcony is not 10 handbreadths high and is therefore part of the courtyard, when one places a partition, what of it? The balcony should nevertheless be considered part of the courtyard. The Talmud answers: We are dealing here with a balcony that is entirely fenced off except
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: With regard to a wall that one lined with ladders, even along a length of more than 10 cubits, it still retains the status of a partition. The ladders do not constitute an opening that is more than 10 cubits wide, which would cause the wall to be regarded as breac
Rav Beruna raised a contradiction to Rav Yehuda in the winepress at Rav Ḥanina’s house: Did Shmuel actually say that such a wall has the status of a partition? Didn’t Rav Naḥman say that Shmuel said: With regard to the residents of a balcony and the residents of a courtyard who forgot and did not e